Sequence-based classification

This page has been approved by the Responsible Curator as essentially complete. CAZypedia is a living document, so further improvement of this page is still possible. If you would like to suggest an addition or correction, please contact the page's Responsible Curator directly by e-mail.

• Authors: ^^^Steve Withers^^^, ^^^Spencer Williams^^^
• Responsible Curator: ^^^Spencer Williams^^^

---

Sequence classification methods require knowledge of at least part of the amino acid sequence for an protein. Algorithmic methods are then used to compare sequences. Each of the resulting families contain proteins that are related by sequence, and by corollary, 3D fold. An obvious shortcoming of sequence-based classifications is that they can only be applied to proteins for which sequence information is available. On the other hand sequence-based classification schemes allow classification of proteins for which no biochemical evidence has been obtained such as the thousands of uncharacterized sequences of carbohydrate-active enzymes that originate from genome sequencing efforts worldwide. Sequence based classification methods are rather different (and in many ways complimentary) to the Enzyme Commission classification scheme, which assigns proteins to groups based on the nature of the reactions that they catalyze.

Classification of glycoside hydrolases

Families

Using a combination of comparison algorithms the glycoside hydrolases have been classified into more than 100 GH families [1]. This classification is permanently available through the Carbohydrate Active enZyme database[2]. Classification of glycoside hydrolases into families allows many useful predictions to be made since it has long been noted that the catalytic machinery and molecular mechanism is conserved for the vast majority of the GH families [3] as well as the geometry around the glycosidic bond (irrespective of naming conventions)[4]. Usually, the mechanism used (ie retaining or inverting) is conserved within a GH family. One notable exception is the glycoside hydrolases of family GH97, which contains both retaining and inverting enzymes; a glutamate acts as a general base in inverting members, whereas an aspartate likely acts as a nucleophile in retaining members [5].

Clans

Classification of GH families into larger groups, termed "clans", has been proposed [6]. A clan is a group of families that possess significant similarity in their tertiary structure, catalytic residues and mechanism. Thus knowledge of three-dimensional structure and the functional assignment of catalytic residues is required for classification into clans. Families within clans are thought to have a common evolutionary ancestry. For an updated table of glycoside hydrolase clans see the CAZy Database [7].

Classification of glycosyltransferases

Using sequence comparison algorithms glycosyltransferases that use nucleotide diphospho-sugar, nucleotide monophospho-sugars and sugar phosphates have been grouped into over 90 GT families [8, 9]. This classification is permanently available through the Carbohydrate Active enZyme database[2]. As for the GH families above, the same three-dimensional fold is expected to occur within each of the GT families. Just as for the glycoside hydrolases, several of the families defined on the basis of sequence similarities turn out to have similar three-dimensional structures.

References

1. Henrissat B (1991). A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem J. 1991;280 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):309-16. DOI:10.1042/bj2800309 |

2. Carbohydrate Active Enzymes database; URL http://www.cazy.org/

3. Gebler J, Gilkes NR, Claeyssens M, Wilson DB, Béguin P, Wakarchuk WW, Kilburn DG, Miller RC Jr, Warren RA, and Withers SG. (1992). Stereoselective hydrolysis catalyzed by related beta-1,4-glucanases and beta-1,4-xylanases. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(18):12559-61. | Google Books | Open Library
4. Henrissat B, Callebaut I, Fabrega S, Lehn P, Mornon JP, and Davies G. (1995). Conserved catalytic machinery and the prediction of a common fold for several families of glycosyl hydrolases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(15):7090-4. DOI:10.1073/pnas.92.15.7090 |
5. Gloster TM, Turkenburg JP, Potts JR, Henrissat B, and Davies GJ. (2008). Divergence of catalytic mechanism within a glycosidase family provides insight into evolution of carbohydrate metabolism by human gut flora. Chem Biol. 2008;15(10):1058-67. DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.09.005 |
6. Henrissat B and Bairoch A. (1996). Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem J. 1996;316 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):695-6. DOI:10.1042/bj3160695 |

7. Carbohydrate Active Enzymes database, glycoside hydrolase classification; URLhttp://www.cazy.org/Glycoside-Hydrolases.html

8. Campbell JA, Davies GJ, Bulone V, and Henrissat B. (1997). A classification of nucleotide-diphospho-sugar glycosyltransferases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem J. 1997;326 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):929-39. DOI:10.1042/bj3260929u |
9. Coutinho PM, Deleury E, Davies GJ, and Henrissat B. (2003). An evolving hierarchical family classification for glycosyltransferases. J Mol Biol. 2003;328(2):307-17. DOI:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00307-3 |