CAZypedia needs your help!
We have many unassigned pages in need of Authors and Responsible Curators. See a page that's out-of-date and just needs a touch-up? - You are also welcome to become a CAZypedian. Here's how.
Scientists at all career stages, including students, are welcome to contribute.
Learn more about CAZypedia's misson here and in this article.
Totally new to the CAZy classification? Read this first.
Difference between revisions of "Glycoside Hydrolase Family 35"
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Substrate specificities == | == Substrate specificities == | ||
− | The major activity of enzymes of this GH family is β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23). | + | The major activity of enzymes of this GH family is β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23). Reported enzymes were isolated from microorganisms such as fungi, bacteria and yeasts; plants, animals and human cells, and from recombinant sources and act in acidic conditions. The β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23) catalyses the hydrolysis of terminal non-reducing β-D-galactose residues in β-D-galactosides as, for example, lactose (1,4-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-D-glucose) and structurally related compounds. GH35 includes multiple genes in various plant species [1-6], suggesting ubiquity of GH35 gene multiplicity in plants. Family 35 β-galactosidases demonstrate specificity towards β1,3-, β1,6- or β1,4-galactosidic linkages. Plant β-galactosidases can be divided into two classes: members of the first are capable of hydrolyzing pectic β-1,4-galactans; another ones can specifically cleave β-1,3- and β1,6-galactosyl linkages of arabinogalactan proteins. |
− | Besides β-galactosidases, GHF35 contains two exo-β-glucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.165) [ | + | Besides β-galactosidases, GHF35 contains two exo-β-glucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.165) [7,8]. This enzyme hydrolyze chitosan or chitosan oligosaccharides to remove successive D-glucosamine residues from the non-reducing termini. |
== Kinetics and Mechanism == | == Kinetics and Mechanism == | ||
− | + | Beta-galactosidases of GH35 family catalyze hydrolysis of β-galactosyl linkages between terminal galactosyl residues of oligosaccharides, glycolipids, and glycoproteins acting via a double-displacement mechanism and retaining β-anomeric configuration of the released galactose molecule. The stereochemistry of the reaction has been first shown by NMR for human β-galactosidase precursor [Zhang et al. 1997] and then confirmed by other investigators for microbial and plant enzymes. | |
− | |||
== Catalytic Residues == | == Catalytic Residues == | ||
− | + | The catalytic residues for family 35 were first predicted on the basis of hydrophobic cluster analysis of proteins of similar protein fold [ ]. Experimentally, the glutamic acid residue 268 was first identified as the catalytic nucleophile in human lysosomal β-galactosidase precursor using the slow substrate 2,4-dinitrophenyl-2-deoxy-2-fluoro- β-D-galactopyranoside that trapped a glycosyl enzyme intermediate. It allowed subsequent peptide mapping and exact nulceophile ID. Further, the same work was done for two bacterial β-galactosidases. Recent structural studies of Maksimainen et al. [ ] revealed the general acid/base catalyst as Glu200 in the β-galactosidase of Trichoderma reeesei which showed two different conformations influencing the catalytic machinery of the enzyme. | |
Revision as of 05:42, 28 January 2011
This page is currently under construction. This means that the Responsible Curator has deemed that the page's content is not quite up to CAZypedia's standards for full public consumption. All information should be considered to be under revision and may be subject to major changes.
- Authors: ^^^Alexander Golubev^^^ and ^^^Anna Kulminskaya^^^
- Responsible Curator: ^^^Anna Kulminskaya^^^
Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH35 | |
Clan | GH-A |
Mechanism | retaining (inferred) |
Active site residues | known |
CAZy DB link | |
https://www.cazy.org/GH35.html |
Substrate specificities
The major activity of enzymes of this GH family is β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23). Reported enzymes were isolated from microorganisms such as fungi, bacteria and yeasts; plants, animals and human cells, and from recombinant sources and act in acidic conditions. The β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23) catalyses the hydrolysis of terminal non-reducing β-D-galactose residues in β-D-galactosides as, for example, lactose (1,4-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-D-glucose) and structurally related compounds. GH35 includes multiple genes in various plant species [1-6], suggesting ubiquity of GH35 gene multiplicity in plants. Family 35 β-galactosidases demonstrate specificity towards β1,3-, β1,6- or β1,4-galactosidic linkages. Plant β-galactosidases can be divided into two classes: members of the first are capable of hydrolyzing pectic β-1,4-galactans; another ones can specifically cleave β-1,3- and β1,6-galactosyl linkages of arabinogalactan proteins.
Besides β-galactosidases, GHF35 contains two exo-β-glucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.165) [7,8]. This enzyme hydrolyze chitosan or chitosan oligosaccharides to remove successive D-glucosamine residues from the non-reducing termini.
Kinetics and Mechanism
Beta-galactosidases of GH35 family catalyze hydrolysis of β-galactosyl linkages between terminal galactosyl residues of oligosaccharides, glycolipids, and glycoproteins acting via a double-displacement mechanism and retaining β-anomeric configuration of the released galactose molecule. The stereochemistry of the reaction has been first shown by NMR for human β-galactosidase precursor [Zhang et al. 1997] and then confirmed by other investigators for microbial and plant enzymes.
Catalytic Residues
The catalytic residues for family 35 were first predicted on the basis of hydrophobic cluster analysis of proteins of similar protein fold [ ]. Experimentally, the glutamic acid residue 268 was first identified as the catalytic nucleophile in human lysosomal β-galactosidase precursor using the slow substrate 2,4-dinitrophenyl-2-deoxy-2-fluoro- β-D-galactopyranoside that trapped a glycosyl enzyme intermediate. It allowed subsequent peptide mapping and exact nulceophile ID. Further, the same work was done for two bacterial β-galactosidases. Recent structural studies of Maksimainen et al. [ ] revealed the general acid/base catalyst as Glu200 in the β-galactosidase of Trichoderma reeesei which showed two different conformations influencing the catalytic machinery of the enzyme.
Three-dimensional structures
Content is to be added here.
Family Firsts
- First stereochemistry determination
- Cite some reference here, with a short (1-2 sentence) explanation [1].
- First catalytic nucleophile identification
- Cite some reference here, with a short (1-2 sentence) explanation [2].
- First general acid/base residue identification
- Cite some reference here, with a short (1-2 sentence) explanation [3].
- First 3-D structure
- Cite some reference here, with a short (1-2 sentence) explanation [4].
References
- Comfort DA, Bobrov KS, Ivanen DR, Shabalin KA, Harris JM, Kulminskaya AA, Brumer H, and Kelly RM. (2007). Biochemical analysis of Thermotoga maritima GH36 alpha-galactosidase (TmGalA) confirms the mechanistic commonality of clan GH-D glycoside hydrolases. Biochemistry. 2007;46(11):3319-30. DOI:10.1021/bi061521n |
-
Sinnott, M.L. (1990) Catalytic mechanisms of enzymic glycosyl transfer. Chem. Rev. 90, 1171-1202. DOI: 10.1021/cr00105a006
- He S and Withers SG. (1997). Assignment of sweet almond beta-glucosidase as a family 1 glycosidase and identification of its active site nucleophile. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(40):24864-7. DOI:10.1074/jbc.272.40.24864 |
- Tanthanuch W, Chantarangsee M, Maneesan J, and Ketudat-Cairns J. (2008). Genomic and expression analysis of glycosyl hydrolase family 35 genes from rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:84. DOI:10.1186/1471-2229-8-84 |
- Davis E (1978). Vaccine damaged children. Australas Nurses J. 1978;7(8):3-6. | Google Books | Open Library
- Fukui T, Atomi H, Kanai T, Matsumi R, Fujiwara S, and Imanaka T. (2005). Complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 and comparison with Pyrococcus genomes. Genome Res. 2005;15(3):352-63. DOI:10.1101/gr.3003105 |