CAZypedia needs your help!
We have many unassigned pages in need of Authors and Responsible Curators. See a page that's out-of-date and just needs a touch-up? - You are also welcome to become a CAZypedian. Here's how.
Scientists at all career stages, including students, are welcome to contribute.
Learn more about CAZypedia's misson here and in this article.
Totally new to the CAZy classification? Read this first.

Difference between revisions of "Glycoside Hydrolase Family 16"

From CAZypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 55: Line 55:
  
 
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==
 
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==
Family 16 enzymes are [[retaining]] enzymes, as first shown by NMR <cite>Malet1993</cite> on an ''[[endo]]''-1,3-1,4-&beta;-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase from ''Bacillus licheniformis''. As such, they utilize a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate, which is broken-down by glycosyl transfer <cite>Sinnott1990</cite> to water or a carbohydrate acceptor substrate in [[glycoside hydrolases]] or [[transglycosidases]], respectively.
+
Members of GH16 enzymes are [[retaining]] enzymes, as first shown by NMR <cite>Malet1993</cite> on an ''[[endo]]''-1,3-1,4-&beta;-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase from ''Bacillus licheniformis''. As such, they utilize a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate, which is broken-down by glycosyl transfer <cite>Sinnott1990</cite> to water or a carbohydrate acceptor substrate in [[glycoside hydrolases]] or [[transglycosidases]], respectively.
  
 
== Catalytic Residues ==
 
== Catalytic Residues ==

Revision as of 10:40, 9 November 2015

Approve icon-50px.png

This page has been approved by the Responsible Curator as essentially complete. CAZypedia is a living document, so further improvement of this page is still possible. If you would like to suggest an addition or correction, please contact the page's Responsible Curator directly by e-mail.


Glycoside Hydrolase Family 16
Clan GH-B
Mechanism retaining
Active site residues known
CAZy DB link
https://www.cazy.org/GH16.html

Substrate specificities

The members of family 16 are active on β-1,4 or β-1,3 glycosidic bonds in various glucans and galactans. A wide diversity of glycoside hydrolases active on plant and marine polysaccharides are found in GH16, including: keratan-sulfate endo-1,4-β-galactosidases (EC 3.2.1.103), endo-1,3-β-galactanases (EC 3.2.1.-), endo-1,3-β-glucanases (EC 3.2.1.39), endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanases (EC 3.2.1.6), lichenases (EC 3.2.1.73), β-agarases (EC 3.2.1.81), β-porphyranases (EC 3.2.1.178) [1], κ-carrageenases (EC 3.2.1.83), and xyloglucanases (EC 3.2.1.151)

Notably, some members of GH16 are predominant transglycosylases. These include the plant xyloglucan:xyloglucosyltransferases (EC 2.4.1.207, a.k.a. xyloglucan endo-transglycosylases) [2] and yeast chitin/beta-glucan crosslinking enzymes Crh1 and Crh2 [3, 4, 5].

Some invertebrate GH16 proteins have lost their catalytic amino acids and are involved in immune response activation through the Toll pathway upon binding of β-1,3 glucan. The role of the GH16 domain in this immune response has not been fully elucidated [6].

Kinetics and Mechanism

Members of GH16 enzymes are retaining enzymes, as first shown by NMR [7] on an endo-1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase from Bacillus licheniformis. As such, they utilize a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate, which is broken-down by glycosyl transfer [8] to water or a carbohydrate acceptor substrate in glycoside hydrolases or transglycosidases, respectively.

Catalytic Residues

The catalytic nucleophile was first proposed using a non-specific epoxyalkyl β-glycoside inhibitor and subsequent peptide identification by ESI-MS and Edman degradation on an endo-1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [9]. This was subsequently verified by azide rescue of the E134A mutant of a Bacillus licheniformis 1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase resulting in an α-glycosyl azide from the β-glycoside substrate [10]. The general acid/base residue was identified by making the E138A mutant from the Bacillus licheniformis 1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase and subsequent azide rescue resulting in a β-glycosyl azide product [10]. These structurally conserved catalytic residues have been confirmed in a number of other GH16 members, including plant xyloglucan endo-hydrolases and endo-transglycosylases [11, 12], and yeast Crh1 and Crh2 [5].

The mechanistic analysis of bacterial mixed-linkage endo-glucanases has been reviewed in the broader context of GH16 [13].

Three-dimensional structures

Proteins in family GH16 share the β-jelly-roll fold in which two β-sheets align in a sandwich like manner and its β-strands are bent around a perpendicular oriented substrate binding cleft. The first solved 3D structure was a hybrid protein of lichenase M from Paenibacillus macerans and BglA from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (PDB 1byh) in 1992 [14]. Several three-dimensional structures have been solved of family 16 members of archeal, bacterial, and eukaryotic origin. The first eukaryotic 3D structure was the xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase PttXET16-34 from Populus tremula×tremuloides (PDB 1umz) [15]. The first archeal 3D structure was a endo-1,3-β-glucanase Lam16 from Pyrococcus furiosus (PDB 2vy0) [16].

Evolution of GH16

Evolution of family 16 (click to enlarge)

Family 16 is a member of clan GH-B together with GH7 and both families share the β-jellyroll fold. The different specificities of family 16 were proposed to have been evolved from an ancestral β-1,3-glucanase [17]. The first branching in family 16 lead to the evolution of the κ-carrageenases and the β-agarases and a later branching event lead to the lichenases and the XETs [18] (see figure). This evolutionary scenario was supported by a structure based phylogeny approach. In GH16 the active site residues are located in one beta-strand at the center of the substrate binding cleft and encoded within the signature motive EXDXXE or EXDXE. These motives feature two topologies, the beta-bulge motive which is more frequent in GH16 compared to the regular beta-strand, in which one amino acid is deleted. Due to the large expansion of the beta-bulge motive and its appearance in the related GH7, Michel et al. proposed that the ancestral enzyme of both families contained the beta-bulge explaining its wide distribution in GH16. This motif subsequently evolved to become the regular beta-strand that is common in contemporary XETs and lichenases. The recent identification of a group of bifunctional GH16 glycoside hydrolases active on both mixed-linkage beta-glucan and xyloglucan provides additional support for the close evolutionary relationship of XETs and licheninases [19].

Family firsts

First stereochemistry determination
Bacillus licheniformis 1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase by NMR [7].
First catalytic nucleophile identification
Suggested in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase via non-specific epoxyalkyl β-glycoside labeling [9]. Later verified by azide rescue of inactivated mutants [10].
First general acid/base residue identification
Bacillus licheniformis 1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase, first suggested by sequence homology and mutational studies [20]. This was later verified by azide rescue of inactivated mutants [10].
First 3-D structure
A hybrid lichenase (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Paenibacillus macerans) by X-ray crystallography (PDB 1byh) [14].

Reference list

  1. Hehemann JH, Correc G, Barbeyron T, Helbert W, Czjzek M, and Michel G. (2010). Transfer of carbohydrate-active enzymes from marine bacteria to Japanese gut microbiota. Nature. 2010;464(7290):908-12. DOI:10.1038/nature08937 | PubMed ID:20376150 [Hehemann2010]
  2. Eklöf JM and Brumer H. (2010). The XTH gene family: an update on enzyme structure, function, and phylogeny in xyloglucan remodeling. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(2):456-66. DOI:10.1104/pp.110.156844 | PubMed ID:20421457 [Eklof2010]
  3. Cabib E, Farkas V, Kosík O, Blanco N, Arroyo J, and McPhie P. (2008). Assembly of the yeast cell wall. Crh1p and Crh2p act as transglycosylases in vivo and in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(44):29859-72. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M804274200 | PubMed ID:18694928 [Cabib2008]
  4. Mazáň M, Blanco N, Kováčová K, Firáková Z, Rehulka P, Farkaš V, and Arroyo J. (2013). A novel fluorescence assay and catalytic properties of Crh1 and Crh2 yeast cell wall transglycosylases. Biochem J. 2013;455(3):307-18. DOI:10.1042/BJ20130354 | PubMed ID:23919454 [Mazan2013]
  5. Blanco N, Sanz AB, Rodríguez-Peña JM, Nombela C, Farkaš V, Hurtado-Guerrero R, and Arroyo J. (2015). Structural and functional analysis of yeast Crh1 and Crh2 transglycosylases. FEBS J. 2015;282(4):715-31. DOI:10.1111/febs.13176 | PubMed ID:25495733 [Blanco2015]
  6. Lee H, Kwon HM, Park JW, Kurokawa K, and Lee BL. (2009). N-terminal GNBP homology domain of Gram-negative binding protein 3 functions as a beta-1,3-glucan binding motif in Tenebrio molitor. BMB Rep. 2009;42(8):506-10. DOI:10.5483/bmbrep.2009.42.8.506 | PubMed ID:19712587 [Lee2009]
  7. Malet C, Jiménez-Barbero J, Bernabé M, Brosa C, and Planas A. (1993). Stereochemical course and structure of the products of the enzymic action of endo-1,3-1,4-beta-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase from Bacillus licheniformis. Biochem J. 1993;296 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):753-8. DOI:10.1042/bj2960753 | PubMed ID:8280073 [Malet1993]
  8. Sinnott, M.L. (1990) Catalytic mechanisms of enzymic glycosyl transfer. Chem. Rev. 90, 1171-1202. DOI: 10.1021/cr00105a006

    [Sinnott1990]
  9. Høj PB, Condron R, Traeger JC, McAuliffe JC, and Stone BA. (1992). Identification of glutamic acid 105 at the active site of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 1,3-1,4-beta-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase using epoxide-based inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(35):25059-66. | Google Books | Open Library PubMed ID:1360982 [Hoj1992]
  10. Viladot JL, de Ramon E, Durany O, and Planas A. (1998). Probing the mechanism of Bacillus 1,3-1,4-beta-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolases by chemical rescue of inactive mutants at catalytically essential residues. Biochemistry. 1998;37(32):11332-42. DOI:10.1021/bi980586q | PubMed ID:9698381 [Viladot1998]
  11. Gullfot F, Ibatullin FM, Sundqvist G, Davies GJ, and Brumer H. (2009). Functional characterization of xyloglucan glycosynthases from GH7, GH12, and GH16 scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10(7):1782-8. DOI:10.1021/bm900215p | PubMed ID:19419143 [Gullfot2009]
  12. Piens K, Henriksson AM, Gullfot F, Lopez M, Fauré R, Ibatullin FM, Teeri TT, Driguez H, and Brumer H. (2007). Glycosynthase activity of hybrid aspen xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase PttXET16-34 nucleophile mutants. Org Biomol Chem. 2007;5(24):3971-8. DOI:10.1039/b714570e | PubMed ID:18043802 [Piens2007]
  13. Planas A (2000). Bacterial 1,3-1,4-beta-glucanases: structure, function and protein engineering. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1543(2):361-382. DOI:10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00231-4 | PubMed ID:11150614 [Planas2000]
  14. Keitel T, Simon O, Borriss R, and Heinemann U. (1993). Molecular and active-site structure of a Bacillus 1,3-1,4-beta-glucanase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(11):5287-91. DOI:10.1073/pnas.90.11.5287 | PubMed ID:8099449 [Keitel1993]
  15. Johansson P, Brumer H 3rd, Baumann MJ, Kallas AM, Henriksson H, Denman SE, Teeri TT, and Jones TA. (2004). Crystal structures of a poplar xyloglucan endotransglycosylase reveal details of transglycosylation acceptor binding. Plant Cell. 2004;16(4):874-86. DOI:10.1105/tpc.020065 | PubMed ID:15020748 [Johansson2004]
  16. Ilari A, Fiorillo A, Angelaccio S, Florio R, Chiaraluce R, van der Oost J, and Consalvi V. (2009). Crystal structure of a family 16 endoglucanase from the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus--structural basis of substrate recognition. FEBS J. 2009;276(4):1048-58. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06848.x | PubMed ID:19154353 [Ilari2009]
  17. Barbeyron T, Gerard A, Potin P, Henrissat B, and Kloareg B. (1998). The kappa-carrageenase of the marine bacterium Cytophaga drobachiensis. Structural and phylogenetic relationships within family-16 glycoside hydrolases. Mol Biol Evol. 1998;15(5):528-37. DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025952 | PubMed ID:9580981 [Barbeyron1998]
  18. Michel G, Chantalat L, Duee E, Barbeyron T, Henrissat B, Kloareg B, and Dideberg O. (2001). The kappa-carrageenase of P. carrageenovora features a tunnel-shaped active site: a novel insight in the evolution of Clan-B glycoside hydrolases. Structure. 2001;9(6):513-25. DOI:10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00612-8 | PubMed ID:11435116 [Michel2001]
  19. Eklöf JM, Shojania S, Okon M, McIntosh LP, and Brumer H. (2013). Structure-function analysis of a broad specificity Populus trichocarpa endo-β-glucanase reveals an evolutionary link between bacterial licheninases and plant XTH gene products. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(22):15786-99. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M113.462887 | PubMed ID:23572521 [Eklof2013]
  20. Juncosa M, Pons J, Dot T, Querol E, and Planas A. (1994). Identification of active site carboxylic residues in Bacillus licheniformis 1,3-1,4-beta-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase by site-directed mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(20):14530-5. | Google Books | Open Library PubMed ID:8182059 [Juncosa1994]
  21. Baumann MJ, Eklöf JM, Michel G, Kallas AM, Teeri TT, Czjzek M, and Brumer H 3rd. (2007). Structural evidence for the evolution of xyloglucanase activity from xyloglucan endo-transglycosylases: biological implications for cell wall metabolism. Plant Cell. 2007;19(6):1947-63. DOI:10.1105/tpc.107.051391 | PubMed ID:17557806 [Baumann2007]
  22. Kotake T, Hirata N, Degi Y, Ishiguro M, Kitazawa K, Takata R, Ichinose H, Kaneko S, Igarashi K, Samejima M, and Tsumuraya Y. (2011). Endo-beta-1,3-galactanase from winter mushroom Flammulina velutipes. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(31):27848-54. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M111.251736 | PubMed ID:21653698 [Kotake2011]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed