Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 80

This page is currently under construction. This means that the Responsible Curator has deemed that the page's content is not quite up to CAZypedia's standards for full public consumption. All information should be considered to be under revision and may be subject to major changes.

• Author: ^^^Immacolata Venditto^^^
• Responsible Curator: ^^^Harry Gilbert^^^

---

CAZy DB link

https://www.cazy.org/CBM80.html

Ligand specificities

CBM80 is a small bacterial CBM family comprising around 96 amino acids and identified in the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome [1]. The only characterized CBM80 modules are CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 and CBM80_RfGH5, which are components of enzymes containing catalytic modules derived from GH5_4 (CAZy - GH5_4) and GH5_7 (CAZy - GH5_7) for CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 and GH5_4 (CAZy - GH5_4) for CBM80_RfGH5 [2]. CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 and CBM80_RfGH5 display specificity for β-1,4- and mixed linked β-1,3-1,4-glucans, while CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 also binds β-1,4-mannans [2]. CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 binds galactomannan in addition to the β-glucans with affinities in the range of 10⁴ M^-1 to 10⁵ M^-1 [2]. The endo-mode of binding to soluble polysaccharide indicates that CBM80 is a type B CBM [2]. The key residues implicated in ligand binding were identified by site-direct mutagenesis (Figure 1) [2]. Alanine substitution of Trp453 and Trp489 revealed a complete abrogation of binding to β-glucans and β-mannans, showing the importance of tryptophan residues in ligand recognition [2]. CBMs that bind to β-1,4-glycans typically contain three aromatic residues that make apolar interactions with sugars [3]. The predicted polar interactions between the protein and β-glycans have very little influence on affinity [2].

Structural Features

Figure 1. Crystal structure of CBM80_RfGH5-1/2. The residues that contribute to ligand recognition are shown.

The three-dimensional structure of CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 (5fu3) was solved using single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) methods and selenomethionyl labelled protein [2]. The structure of CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 (Figure 1) apo, and in complex with mannohexaose and cellohexaose, was solved with resolutions of 1.0 Å, 1.4 Å and 1.5 Å, respectively [2]. CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 has a β-sandwich fold consisting of two β-sheets (β-sheet 1 and 2) comprising of four anti-parallel β-strands each (Figure 1) [2]. The β-sheet 2 of CBM80_RfGH-5-1/2 presents a planar hydrophobic surface with a parallel orientation of Trp453 and Trp489 and a perpendicular orientation of a third aromatic residue, Trp490 [2]. The mannohexaose CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 complex revealed electron density for mannohexaose along the hydrophobic surface of β-sheet 2 [2]. The structure of CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 in complex with cellohexaose revealed electron density for only three glucose units [2].

Functionalities

CBM80 modules play an enzyme-targeting role that is specific to the Ruminococcus in a highly complex scaffold [4]. CBM80_RfGH5-1/2, a module in an enzyme that contains GH5_7 (CAZy - GH5_7) and GH5_4 catalytic modules (CAZy - GH5_4), binds β-glucans and β-mannans [2]. Other examples of CBMs that recognize both β-1,4-glucans and β-1,4-mannans are found in families CBM16 [5] and CBM29 [3]. CBM80_RfGH5, a module in an enzyme that contains a GH5_4 catalytic module, display specificity for β-glucans [2].

Family Firsts

First Identified

CBM80 from the Ruminococcus flavefaciens CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 and CBM80_RfGH5 [2].

First Structural Characterization

The first 3D crystal structure solved was CBM80_RfGH5-1/2 [2].

References

1. Rincon MT, Dassa B, Flint HJ, Travis AJ, Jindou S, Borovok I, Lamed R, Bayer EA, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Antonopoulos DA, Berg Miller ME, and White BA. (2010). Abundance and diversity of dockerin-containing proteins in the fiber-degrading rumen bacterium, Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12476. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0012476 |
2. Venditto I, Luis AS, Rydahl M, Schückel J, Fernandes VO, Vidal-Melgosa S, Bule P, Goyal A, Pires VM, Dourado CG, Ferreira LM, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Knox JP, Baslé A, Najmudin S, Gilbert HJ, Willats WG, and Fontes CM. (2016). Complexity of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome reflects an expansion in glycan recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(26):7136-41. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1601558113 |
3. Charnock SJ, Bolam DN, Nurizzo D, Szabó L, McKie VA, Gilbert HJ, and Davies GJ. (2002). Promiscuity in ligand-binding: The three-dimensional structure of a Piromyces carbohydrate-binding module, CBM29-2, in complex with cello- and mannohexaose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(22):14077-82. DOI:10.1073/pnas.212516199 |
4. Bensoussan L, Moraïs S, Dassa B, Friedman N, Henrissat B, Lombard V, Bayer EA, and Mizrahi I. (2017). Broad phylogeny and functionality of cellulosomal components in the bovine rumen microbiome. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19(1):185-197. DOI:10.1111/1462-2920.13561 |
5. Bae B, Ohene-Adjei S, Kocherginskaya S, Mackie RI, Spies MA, Cann IK, and Nair SK. (2008). Molecular basis for the selectivity and specificity of ligand recognition by the family 16 carbohydrate-binding modules from Thermoanaerobacterium polysaccharolyticum ManA. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(18):12415-25. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M706513200 |