CAZypedia needs your help!
We have many unassigned pages in need of Authors and Responsible Curators. See a page that's out-of-date and just needs a touch-up? - You are also welcome to become a CAZypedian. Here's how.
Scientists at all career stages, including students, are welcome to contribute.
Learn more about CAZypedia's misson here and in this article.
Totally new to the CAZy classification? Read this first.
Difference between revisions of "Carbohydrate Esterase Family 9"
Harry Brumer (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
<biblio> | <biblio> | ||
#Park2001 pmid=11395446 | #Park2001 pmid=11395446 | ||
− | + | #Osipiuk2002 PDB entry [{{PDBlink}}3EGJ 3egj], unpublished. | |
− | #Osipiuk2002 | ||
− | |||
#Vincent2004 pmid=14557261 | #Vincent2004 pmid=14557261 | ||
− | |||
#Ferreira2006 pmid=16630633 | #Ferreira2006 pmid=16630633 | ||
− | |||
#Ahangar2018 pmid=29728457 | #Ahangar2018 pmid=29728457 | ||
− | |||
#White1967 pmid=4861885 | #White1967 pmid=4861885 | ||
− | |||
</biblio> | </biblio> | ||
[[Category:Carbohydrate Esterase Families|CE009]] | [[Category:Carbohydrate Esterase Families|CE009]] |
Revision as of 16:31, 17 October 2018
This page is currently under construction. This means that the Responsible Curator has deemed that the page's content is not quite up to CAZypedia's standards for full public consumption. All information should be considered to be under revision and may be subject to major changes.
- Author: ^^^Alex Anderson^^^
- Responsible Curator: ^^^Michael Suits^^^
Carbohydrate Esterase Family 9 | |
Clan | GH-x |
Mechanism | retaining/inverting |
Active site residues | not known |
CAZy DB link | |
https://www.cazy.org/CE9.html |
Substrate specificities
CE family 9 esterases catalyze the deacetylation of N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate to glucosamine-6-phosphate. This reaction has been demonstrated to be important for both amino sugar metabolism and peptidoglycan cell wall recycling in bacteria [1]. Experimental substrate specificity profiles for two CE9 enzymes demonstrated that they are active on other structurally similar amino sugar phosphates, such as N-acetyl- galactosamine-6-phosphate and N-acetyl-mannosamine-6-phosphate, although their reported affinities are 40-fold and 6-fold lower, respectively [2].
Kinetics and Mechanism
Removal of the acetate group by CE9 enzymes is proposed to be carried out by nucleophilic attack of the acetate carbon by a metal-bound hydroxide ion [3]. A proton is donated to the amine leaving group by a catalytic acid residue, and the tetrahedral transition state is stabilized either by the interaction of a second metal ion with the polarized carbonyl oxygen [3], or by a catalytic base residue where a second metal ion is absent from the active site, although the latter has not been experimentally demonstrated.
Catalytic Residues
The precise mechanism of catalysis has yet to be elucidated for CE9, although several conserved features in the active sites of resolved CE9 members suggest they play an important role in their function. In Bacillus subtilis NagA, Thermotoga maritima NagA, and Mycobacterium smegmatis NagA, four histidine residues are responsible for coordination of the metal cofactor(s), along with a glutamate in B. subtilis and T. maritima, and an aspartic acid in M. smegmatis [3, 4, 5]. The Escherichia coli NagA appears to have a glutamine, gluatamate, asparagine and an aspartate as the coordination enviroment, although this structure crystallized as the apoenzyme, and so this configuration is uncertain [5]. In all structures, a strictly conserved aspartic acid residue is then thought to serve as a base to activate a water molecule, and then as an acid to protonate the leaving amine [3].
Three-dimensional structures
The resolved structures of CE9 enzymes demonstrate variability in their organization and metal binding. For example, Vibrio cholerae NagA and B. subtilis NagA form dimers in their biologically relevant assemblies [3, 4], while E. coli NagA forms a tetramer [5]. Additionally, these same enzymes appear to contain a Ni2+ ion [4], two Fe2+ ions [3], and a Zn2+ ion [5] in their active sites, respectively. All resolved CE9 enzymes contain a distorted (β/α)8 fold containing the active site, and a small β-sheet domain comprising residues from both the N- and C-termini.
Family Firsts
- First characterized
The E. coli N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase NagA was the first CE9 enzyme to have its activity demonstrated [6].
- First 3-D structure
The first structure of a CE9 enzyme published was the B. subtilis NagA, containing a two-Fe2+ catalytic center [3].
- First mechanistic insight
The structure of the B. subtilis NagA enzyme was reported with a bound N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate molecule and provided evidence for the proposed metal-dependent catalytic mechanism [3].
References
- Park JT (2001). Identification of a dedicated recycling pathway for anhydro-N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine derived from Escherichia coli cell wall murein. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(13):3842-7. DOI:10.1128/JB.183.13.3842-3847.2001 |
- Ahangar MS, Furze CM, Guy CS, Cooper C, Maskew KS, Graham B, Cameron AD, and Fullam E. (2018). Structural and functional determination of homologs of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase (NagA). J Biol Chem. 2018;293(25):9770-9783. DOI:10.1074/jbc.RA118.002597 |
- Vincent F, Yates D, Garman E, Davies GJ, and Brannigan JA. (2004). The three-dimensional structure of the N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase, NagA, from Bacillus subtilis: a member of the urease superfamily. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(4):2809-16. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M310165200 |
-
PDB entry 3egj, unpublished.
- Ferreira FM, Mendoza-Hernandez G, Castañeda-Bueno M, Aparicio R, Fischer H, Calcagno ML, and Oliva G. (2006). Structural analysis of N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase apoenzyme from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 2006;359(2):308-21. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.024 |
- White RJ and Pasternak CA. (1967). The purification and properties of N-acetylglucosamine 6-phosphate deacetylase from Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 1967;105(1):121-5. DOI:10.1042/bj1050121 |