Difference between revisions of "Glycoside Hydrolase Family 23"

Revision as of 04:16, 20 April 2010

This page has been approved by the Responsible Curator as essentially complete. CAZypedia is a living document, so further improvement of this page is still possible. If you would like to suggest an addition or correction, please contact the page's Responsible Curator directly by e-mail.

Author: ^^^Anthony Clarke^^^
Responsible Curator: ^^^Anthony Clarke^^^

Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH23
Clan	none, α+β "lysozyme fold"
Mechanism	retaining/inverting
Active site residues	known
CAZy DB link
http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH23.html

Substrate specificities

The glycoside hydrolases of this family are lytic transglycosylases (also referred to as peptidoglycan lyases) of both bacterial and bacteriophage origin, and family G lysozymes (EC 3.2.1.17; muramidase, peptidoglycan N-acetylmuramoylhydrolase, 1,4-β-N-acetylmuramidase, N-acetylmuramoylhydrolase) of eukaryotic origin. Both of these enzymes are active on peptidoglycan, but only the lysozymes are active on chitin and chitooligosaccharides. No other activities have been observed.

The lytic transglycosylases of GH23 constitute Family 1 of the organizational scheme of Blackburn and Clarke [1]. This family has been subdivided into five subfamilies (1A-1E) with Escherichia coli soluble lytic transglycosylase 70 (Slt70), membrane-bound lytic transglycosylase C (MltC), MltE, MltD, and MltF (formerly, YfhD) serving as the prototypes for families 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E, respectively.

Kinetics and Mechanism

Figure 1. Lytic and hydrolytic pathways of GH23 enzymes. GEWL, g-type lysozymes; LT, lytic transglycosylase. (click to enlarge).

The enzymes of this family cleave the β-1,4 linkage between N-acetylmuramoyl and N-acetylglucosaminyl residues in peptidoglycan (Figure 1). Only the lysozymes of this family are capable of releasing N-acetyl-d-glucosamine residues from chitodextrins, and neither catalyze (inter) transglycosylation reactions. The stereochemistry of the reaction catalysed by the family G lysozymes has been determined experimentally as inverting [2]. On the other hand, the lytic transglycosidases, strictly speaking, are retaining enzymes. However, unlike lysozyme, they are not hydrolases but rather catalyse an intramolecular glycosyl transfer reaction to the C-6 hydroxyl group of the muramoyl residue leading to the generation of a terminal 1,6-anhydromuramoyl product thus lacking a reducing end [3]. The lytic transglycosylases require the peptide side chains in peptidoglycan for activity, accounting for their inactivity against chitin or chitooligosaccharides [4]. No detailed analyses involving both steady state and pre-steady state kinetic studies have been reported.

Catalytic Residues

Figure 2. Detailed catalytic mechanism of GH23 lytic transglycosylases (click to enlarge).

Until recently, the family GH23 enzymes were thought to have only a single catalytic residue at their catalytic centre. The identity of the catalytic general acid/base residue of the lysozymes was first inferred by X-ray crystallography of goose egg-white lysozyme (GEWL) as Glu73 [5, 6]. Likewise, analysis of the crystal structure of E. coli Slt70 identified Glu as the lone catalytic residue[7]. Replacement of each respective residue results in loss of catalytic activity [2, 8]. The mechanism of action of the family GH23 enzymes has yet to be proven experimentally, but examination of crystal structures and theoretical considerations have led to separate proposals for the two classes of enzymes.

With the lytic transglycosylases, there is still no evidence for a second catalytic residue at their active sites. Hence, based on the complexes formed with 1,6-anhydromuropeptide [9] or bulgecin [10], a two-step mechanism that invokes neighboring group participation or substrate assisted catalysis, analogous to the family GH18 chitinases and chitobiases and family GH20 N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidases, has been invoked. Thus, in the first step the Glu73 residue is proposed to serve initially as a general acid to donate a proton to the glycosidic oxygen of the linkage (Figure 2). At the same time anchimeric assistance by the MurNAc 2-acetamido group results in the formation an oxazolinium ion intermediate. In the second step Glu73 acts as a general base to abstract the proton from the C-6 hydroxyl leading to its nucleophilic attack on the anomeric centre and the formation of 1,6-anhydromuramic acid product. The transition state leading to and from the intermediate possess oxocarbenium ion character (Figure 2).

For the g-type lysozymes, recent studies support a typical inverting mechanism of action [11, 12] involving catalytic acid and base residues. It was proposed that two catalytic general base residues, a primary and a secondary residue, position a catalytic water molecule and abstract a proton to effect substrate hydrolysis by the single displacement mechanism. With GEWL, Asp97 and Asp86, respectively, are proposed to serve this function while these would be represented by the conserved Asp101 and Asp90 residues in the g-type lysozyme from Atlantic cod fish. Indeed, the double replacement of Asp101 and Asp90 in the cod lysozyme results in over a 300-fold decrease in activity [11].

Three-dimensional structures

Three-dimensional structures are available for several Family GH23 enzymes, the first solved being that of GEWL [6, 13]. The catalytic domain of each enzyme possesses the well characterized α+β "lysozyme fold" for avian lysozymes. However, there are distinct structural differences between the two classes of enzymes. Most notably, the environment of the active site in lytic transglycosylases, particularly around the catalytic acid/base, is more hydrophobic compared to that of GEWL. This distinction may account for the difference in the reaction mechanisms of the two enzymes.

Family Firsts

First identification of lytic transglycosylase: Soluble lytic transglycosylase 70 [3].
First catalytic nucleophile identification: For g-type lysozymes [12]; Not applicable for lytic transglycosylases.
First general acid/base residue identification: Inferred by X-ray crystallography of goose egg-white lysozyme [6].
First 3-D structure: Goose egg-white lysozyme [13].

References

All Medline abstracts: PubMed

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 [[Image:LTmechanism.jpg|thumb|right|'''Figure 2.''' Detailed catalytic mechanism of GH23 lytic transglycosylases (''click to enlarge''). ]]Until recently, the family GH23 enzymes were thought to have only a single catalytic residue at their catalytic centre. The identity of the catalytic [[general acid/base]] residue of the lysozymes was first inferred by X-ray crystallography of goose egg-white lysozyme (GEWL) as Glu73 <cite>6 7</cite>.   Likewise, analysis of the crystal structure of ''E. coli'' Slt70 identified Glu as the lone catalytic residue<cite>8</cite>.   Replacement of each respective residue results in loss of catalytic activity <cite>9 10</cite>.  The mechanism of action of the family GH23 enzymes has yet to be proven experimentally, but examination of crystal structures and theoretical considerations have led to separate proposals for the two classes of enzymes.
-With the lytic transglycosylases, there is still no evidence for a second catalytic residue at their active sites.  Hence, based on the complexes formed with 1,6-anhydromuropeptide <cite>12</cite> or bulgecin <cite>11</cite>, a two-step  mechanism that invokes [[neighboring group participation]] or substrate assisted catalysis, analogous to the family [[GH18]] chitinases and chitobiases and family [[GH20]] ''N''-acetyl-β-hexosaminidases, has been invoked.  Thus, in the first step the Glu73 residue is proposed to serve initially as a [[general acid]] to donate a proton to the glycosidic oxygen of the linkage (Figure 2). At the same time anchimeric assistance by the MurNAc 2-acetamido group results in the formation an oxazolinium ion intermediate. In the second step Glu73 acts as a [[general base]] to abstract the proton from teh C-6 hydroxyl leading to its nucleophilic attack on the anomeric centre and the formation of 1,6-anhydromuramic acid product. The transition state leading to and from the intermediate possess oxocarbenium ion character (Figure 2).
+With the lytic transglycosylases, there is still no evidence for a second catalytic residue at their active sites.  Hence, based on the complexes formed with 1,6-anhydromuropeptide <cite>12</cite> or bulgecin <cite>11</cite>, a two-step  mechanism that invokes [[neighboring group participation]] or substrate assisted catalysis, analogous to the family [[GH18]] chitinases and chitobiases and family [[GH20]] ''N''-acetyl-β-hexosaminidases, has been invoked.  Thus, in the first step the Glu73 residue is proposed to serve initially as a [[general acid]] to donate a proton to the glycosidic oxygen of the linkage (Figure 2). At the same time anchimeric assistance by the MurNAc 2-acetamido group results in the formation an oxazolinium ion intermediate. In the second step Glu73 acts as a [[general base]] to abstract the proton from the C-6 hydroxyl leading to its nucleophilic attack on the anomeric centre and the formation of 1,6-anhydromuramic acid product. The transition state leading to and from the intermediate possess oxocarbenium ion character (Figure 2).
 For the g-type lysozymes, recent studies support a typical inverting mechanism of action <cite>2 3</cite> involving catalytic acid and base residues.  It was proposed that two catalytic [[general base]] residues, a primary and a secondary residue, position a catalytic water molecule and abstract a proton to effect substrate hydrolysis by the single displacement mechanism.  With GEWL, Asp97 and Asp86, respectively, are proposed to serve this function while these would be represented by the conserved Asp101 and Asp90 residues in the g-type lysozyme from Atlantic cod fish.  Indeed, the double replacement of Asp101 and Asp90 in the cod lysozyme results in over a 300-fold decrease in activity <cite>2</cite>.