Glycoside Hydrolase Family 13

This page is currently under construction. This means that the Responsible Curator has deemed that the page's content is not quite up to CAZypedia's standards for full public consumption. All information should be considered to be under revision and may be subject to major changes.

• Authors: ^^^Birte Svensson^^^ and ^^^Stefan Janecek^^^
• Responsible Curator: ^^^Birte Svensson^^^

---

Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH13
Clan	GH-H
Mechanism	retaining
Active site residues	known
CAZy DB link
http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH13.html

Substrate specificities

Family GH13 is the major glycoside hydrolase family acting on substrates containing α-glucoside linkages. A number of reviews are concerned with α-amylases [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. GH13 contains hydrolases, transglycosidases and isomerases [4]; noticeably animal amino acid transporters [6], which have no glycosidase activity [7], are also GH13 members. The enzymes are found in a very wide range of organisms from all kingdoms. While known specificities are indicated by the enzyme named as listed below, for several of these numerous enzymes are characterized representing subspecificities defined by structural requirements for preferred substrates or the structure of the predominant product(s). Described enzymes include: α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1); oligo-1,6-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.10); α-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.20); pullulanase (EC 3.2.1.41); cyclomaltodextrinase (EC 3.2.1.54); maltotetraose-forming α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.60); isoamylase (EC 3.2.1.68); dextran glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.70); trehalose-6-phosphate hydrolase (EC 3.2.1.93); maltohexaose-forming α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.98); maltotriose-forming α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.116); maltogenic amylase (EC 3.2.1.133); neopullulanase (EC 3.2.1.135); malto-oligosyltrehalose trehalohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.141); maltopentaose-forming α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.-); amylosucrase (EC 2.4.1.4); sucrose phosphorylase (EC 2.4.1.7); branching enzyme (EC 2.4.1.18); cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) (EC 2.4.1.19); 4-α-glucanotransferase (EC 2.4.1.25); isomaltulose synthase (EC 5.4.99.11); trehalose synthase (EC 5.4.99.16). As mentioned above, heavy-chains of heteromeric amino acid transporters belong to the GH13 [6, 8]. Among thousands of sequences and ~30 different enzymes specificities [9] many are closely related to each other, GH13 therefore has officially been subdivided into almost 40 subfamilies [10]; several subfamilies, e.g., the oligo-1,6-glucosidase and neopullulanase subfamilies were described earlier [11]. Noticeably a considerable number of GH13 members contain carbohydrate binding modules (CBMs) referred to as starch binding domains belonging to CBM20, 21, 25, 26, 34, 41, 45, 48, 53, and 58 [12, 13, 14, 15, 16].

The GH13 enzymes have a wide range of different preferred substrates and products. For example, the α-amylases prefer polysaccharides of the α-1,4-glucan type, such as amylose and amylopectin, but are also able to attack the supramolecular structures represented by starch granules and glycogen particles. Besides they have some significant albeit slower turn-over of maltooligosaccharides of a certain degree of polymerization. These typical substrate profiles can be manipulated through protein engineering.

The α-amylase family was defined in 1991 as family GH13 when the sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases was created [17]. The α-amylase family as an enzyme family, however, was established based on results of several independent findings focused on starch hydrolases and related enzymes [18, 19, 20, 21]. These enzymes were shown to exhibit sequence similarities and, at that time, a predicted (β/α)8-barrel (i.e. TIM-barrel) fold. The basic criteria for a protein to be a member of the α-amylase family were as follows [21]: the enzyme should (i) act on the α-glucosidic linkages; (ii) hydrolyse or form by transglycosylation the α-glucosidic linkages; (iii) contain the four conserved sequence regions in its amino acid sequence; and (iv) possess the catalytic triad formed by the three residues corresponding to Asp206, Glu230 and Asp297 of Taka-amylase A (the α-amylase from Aspergillus oryzae). A dramatic increase of the number of GH13 members to several thousands [9] offered a greater variety in both substrate and product specificities and sequence diversity so that the above criteria had to be updated. For example, also enzymes active on α-1,1-, α-1,2-, α-1,3- and α-1,5-glucosidic linkages belong to the α-amylase family [4] and the four best known and well-accepted conserved sequence regions, defined first for eleven α-amylases [22], were completed by the additional three regions [23, 24] which can often help to assign the correct enzyme specificity of α-amylase family members (for a review, see [25]). Of note may be the enzyme neopullulanase [26] that was found to catalyze both the hydrolysis of α-1,4- and α-1,6-glucosidic bonds as well as the transglycosylation to form these two types of glucosidic bonds.

The α-amylase family represents a clan GH-H of three glycoside hydrolase families GH13, GH70 and GH77 [4], and should be distinguished from the second smaller α-amylase family GH57 [27]. A remote homology to the family GH31 has also been discussed [28].

The evolutionary relationships were described for the entire GH13 family [2, 10, 20, 29] and some closely related specificities, i.e. subfamilies [11, 30], as well as many examples of close evolutionary relatedness were reported for the individual groups of α-amylases, e.g., those from animals and actinomycetes [24], plants and archaeons [31, 32], insects [33], and fungi [34, 35].

Exogenous and endogenous inhibitory proteins have also been reported from microorganisms and plants [36] directed towards α-amylases [37] and limit dextrinases [38, 39, 40].

Kinetics and Mechanism

GH13 enzymes employ the retaining mechanism. This was first demonstrated by quantitative gas liquid chromatographic analysis of formation of α-maltose from different maltosides [41] and further supported by the NMR analysis of the release of α-maltose from similar substrates [42]. It was also demonstrated for a number of different α-amylases that they follow the classical Koshland double-displacement mechanism. This has moreover been supported by covalent labelling using 4-deoxy-maltotriose-fluoride trapping the catalytic nucleophile [43], numerous three-dimensional structures, and site-directed mutational substitution of the catalytic site residues [44, 45]. Some of the GH13 members use a multiple attack or processive mechanism [46, 47, 48] involving several glycoside bond cleavages to be executed in the same enzyme-substrate encounter. In several cases the binding energies have been determined by using subsite mapping [49, 50, 51, 52], which gives a subsite binding energy profile characteristic for individual enzymes. Several α-amylases have been reported to interact with polymeric substrates at surface sites situated as a certain distance of the active site [53, 54, 55, 56]. Finally interaction with insoluble substrates, such as starch granules or glycogen can occur both at these sites [54, 55, 57] as well as by the involvement of separate binding modules referred to as starch binding domains [58, 59, 60, 61].

Catalytic Residues

The catalytic residues have been identified from early crystal structures [62, 63]. In fact throughout the family GH13 only the catalytic triad plus an arginine residue are totally conserved; the catalytic site includes an aspartate as catalytic nucleophile, a glutamate as general acid/base, and an aspartate that participates critically in stabilizing the transition state [43]. The fourth invariantly conserved GH13 residue, the arginine, is positioned two residues preceding the catalytic nucleophile [4]. This conservation does not apply for the enzymatically inactive heavy-chains (rBAT proteins and 4F2hc antigens) of the amino acid transporters [8]. Numerous mutational analyses have been performed to confirm the essential roles of the three residues in catalysis, and normally the loss in activity is four-five orders of magnitude.

Three-dimensional structures

Numerous GH13 subfamilies contain members for which a three-dimensional structure has been determined. In general, the GH13 members are multidomain proteins with catalytic (β/α)8-barrel (i.e. TIM-barrel) domain (called domain A) having a small domain B (usually varying in length and of irregular structure) [6] inserted in the loop between the β3-strand and α3-helix of the barrel, and succeeded by the C-terminal antiparallel β-sandwich domain, called domain C. The catalytic site formed by the C-terminal extensions of strands β4, β5 and β7, carrying the catalytic triad of aspartate, glutamate and aspartate, respectively [62, 64, 65], but also other loops contribute to the overall architecture of the active site.

The first crystals for barley α-amylase were reported in the mid-forties, however the first crystal structures were those of TAKA-amylase A [62, 66] and porcine pancreatic α-amylase [63, 64]. This was followed by structures of other α-amylases from bacteria [67, 68, 69] and from higher plants [65, 70]; the industrially important cyclodextrin glucanotransferase [71, 72, 73] and the closely related maltogenic α-amylase [74]. Later on the structures of the amylopectin debranching isoamylase [75] and the related pullulanase [76] and limit dextrinase [77] were determined. Furthermore the oligo-1,6-glucosidase [78] and the related dextran glucosidase [79], as well as maltogenic amylase [80], cyclomaltodextrinase [81] and neopullulanase [82] - nearly indistinguishable from each other - together with the neopullulanase-like “α-amylases” TVA I [83] and TVA II [84], and the amylosucrase [85], sucrose phosphorylase [86], sucrose hydrolase [87] and sucrose isomerase [88, 89], were solved. Finally structures have been solved of glycogen branching [90] and debranching [91] enzymes.

Among the solved structures are numerous site-directed-mutant and ligand-complexed forms. However, although there are structures available for most of the GH13 specificities, some still remain to be determined. Noticeably crystal structures are available of several α-amylase/proteinaceous inhibitor complexes (for reviews, see [37, 92]).

Family Firsts

First sterochemistry determination

α-Maltose was released from different α-maltosides by Bacillus subtilis saccharifying α-amylase, Taka-amylase A, and porcine pancreas α-amylase, as determined by quantitative gas liquid chromatography [41]. This was as well demonstrated by NMR analysis of the anomeric configuration of the released product [42].

First catalytic nucleophile

A glycosidic covalent bond was formed in the intermediate of the mechanism between the catalytic nucleophile (D229) of Bacillus circulans 251 CGTase and a maltotriosyl moiety [43]. Mutational analysis of human pancreatic α-amylase provided strong support for D197 being the catalytic nucleophile as demonstrated by kinetics analysis [93].

First general acid/base

Mutational analysis of human pancreatic α-amylase using enzymatic kinetics and structural analysis provided strong support for E233 playing the role of the catalytic acid/base [93].

First 3-D structure

The first high-resolution three-dimensional structure was determined for Taka-amylase A [62].

References

Error fetching PMID 8018865:
Error fetching PMID 9401418:
Error fetching PMID 16232518:
Error fetching PMID 11257505:
Error fetching PMID 11796168:
Error fetching PMID 9302327:
Error fetching PMID 17724034:
Error fetching PMID 19878315:
Error fetching PMID 17085431:
Error fetching PMID 12530525:
Error fetching PMID 2481445:
Error fetching PMID 10452542:
Error fetching PMID 15939348:
Error fetching PMID 1747104:
Error fetching PMID 2524186:
Error fetching PMID 1741756:
Error fetching PMID 8136030:
Error fetching PMID 1388153:
Error fetching PMID 1471979:
Error fetching PMID 7925367:
Error fetching PMID 1917847:
Error fetching PMID 17349635:
Error fetching PMID 7926034:
Error fetching PMID 10825529:
Error fetching PMID 10079280:
Error fetching PMID 10030014:
Error fetching PMID 14704857:
Error fetching PMID 18048915:
Error fetching PMID 20552260:
Error fetching PMID 17730484:
Error fetching PMID 14871655:
Error fetching PMID 14871657:
Error fetching PMID 1569044:
Error fetching PMID 10331869:
Error fetching PMID 17824673:
Error fetching PMID 17630303:
Error fetching PMID 6076229:
Error fetching PMID 8215418:
Error fetching PMID 15697208:
Error fetching PMID 6611158:
Error fetching PMID 1390923:
Error fetching PMID 16949579:
Error fetching PMID 17803687:
Error fetching PMID 18588886:
Error fetching PMID 19606835:
Error fetching PMID 18951906:
Error fetching PMID 11307950:
Error fetching PMID 10919790:
Error fetching PMID 10947962:
Error fetching PMID 16403494:
Error fetching PMID 6609921:
Error fetching PMID 3502087:
Error fetching PMID 8515451:
Error fetching PMID 8196040:
Error fetching PMID 9283074:
Error fetching PMID 7877175:
Error fetching PMID 9541387:
Error fetching PMID 10924103:
Error fetching PMID 12906828:
Error fetching PMID 2531228:
Error fetching PMID 12809508:
Error fetching PMID 10387084:
Error fetching PMID 8370659:
Error fetching PMID 18395742:
Error fetching PMID 10473583:
Error fetching PMID 11923309:
Error fetching PMID 12547200:
Error fetching PMID 12051850:
Error fetching PMID 10222200:
Error fetching PMID 11306569:
Error fetching PMID 14756551:
Error fetching PMID 18565544:
Error fetching PMID 12819210:
Error fetching PMID 17597061:
Error fetching PMID 14871658:
Error fetching PMID 11914097:

9. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, and Henrissat B. (2009). The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D233-8. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkn663 |
15. Machovic M and Janecek S. (2006). Starch-binding domains in the post-genome era. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63(23):2710-24. DOI:10.1007/s00018-006-6246-9 |
16. Christiansen C, Abou Hachem M, Janecek S, Viksø-Nielsen A, Blennow A, and Svensson B. (2009). The carbohydrate-binding module family 20--diversity, structure, and function. FEBS J. 2009;276(18):5006-29. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07221.x |

22. Nakajima R, Imanaka T, and Aiba S. Comparison of amino acid sequences of eleven different α-amylases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1986; 23(5) 355-60. (DOI: 10.1007/BF00257032)

25. Janecek S. How many conserved sequence regions are there in the α-amylase family? Biologia 2002; 57(Suppl. 11) 29-41. (PDF)

27. Janecek S Amylolytic families of glycoside hydrolases: focus on the family GH-57. Biologia 2005; 60(Suppl. 16) 177-84. (PDF)

38. Macri LJ, MacGregor AW, Schroeder SW, and Bazin SL. Detection of a limit dextrinase inhibitor in barley. J Cereal Sci 1993; 18(2) 103-6. (Normal 0 21 false false false SK X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 10.1006/jcrs.1993.1038 DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.1993.1038)

39. MacGregor AW, Donald LJ, MacGregor EA, and Duckworth HW. Stoichiometry of the complex formed by barley limit dextrinase with its endogenous inhibitor. Determination by electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Cereal Sci 2003; 37(3) 357-62. (Normal 0 21 false false false SK X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 10.1006/jcrs.2002.0500 DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.2002.0500)

41. Kimura A, and Chiba S. Quantitative study of anomeric forms of maltose produced by α- and β-amylases. Agric Biol Chem 1983; 47(8) 1747-53. ([1])

51. Macgregor AW, Morgan JE, and Macgregor EA. The action of germinated barley α-amylases on linear maltodextrins. Carbohydr Res 1992; 227() 301-13. (DOI: 10.1016/0008-6215(92)85080-J)

58. Penninga D, van der Veen BA, Knegtel RM, van Hijum SA, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, Dijkstra BW, and Dijkhuizen L. (1996). The raw starch binding domain of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Bacillus circulans strain 251. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(51):32777-84. DOI:10.1074/jbc.271.51.32777 |
72. Lawson CL, van Montfort R, Strokopytov B, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, de Vries GE, Penninga D, Dijkhuizen L, and Dijkstra BW. (1994). Nucleotide sequence and X-ray structure of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Bacillus circulans strain 251 in a maltose-dependent crystal form. J Mol Biol. 1994;236(2):590-600. DOI:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1168 |
75. Katsuya Y, Mezaki Y, Kubota M, and Matsuura Y. (1998). Three-dimensional structure of Pseudomonas isoamylase at 2.2 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1998;281(5):885-97. DOI:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1992 |
76. Mikami B, Iwamoto H, Malle D, Yoon HJ, Demirkan-Sarikaya E, Mezaki Y, and Katsuya Y. (2006). Crystal structure of pullulanase: evidence for parallel binding of oligosaccharides in the active site. J Mol Biol. 2006;359(3):690-707. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.058 |
77. Vester-Christensen MB, Abou Hachem M, Svensson B, and Henriksen A. (2010). Crystal structure of an essential enzyme in seed starch degradation: barley limit dextrinase in complex with cyclodextrins. J Mol Biol. 2010;403(5):739-50. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.031 |
90. Abad MC, Binderup K, Rios-Steiner J, Arni RK, Preiss J, and Geiger JH. (2002). The X-ray crystallographic structure of Escherichia coli branching enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(44):42164-70. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M205746200 |
91. Woo EJ, Lee S, Cha H, Park JT, Yoon SM, Song HN, and Park KH. (2008). Structural insight into the bifunctional mechanism of the glycogen-debranching enzyme TreX from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(42):28641-8. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M802560200 |