CAZypedia needs your help!
We have many unassigned pages in need of Authors and Responsible Curators. See a page that's out-of-date and just needs a touch-up? - You are also welcome to become a CAZypedian. Here's how.
Scientists at all career stages, including students, are welcome to contribute.
Learn more about CAZypedia's misson here and in this article.
Totally new to the CAZy classification? Read this first.

Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 79

From CAZypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Under construction icon-blue-48px.png

This page is currently under construction. This means that the Responsible Curator has deemed that the page's content is not quite up to CAZypedia's standards for full public consumption. All information should be considered to be under revision and may be subject to major changes.


CAZy DB link
https://www.cazy.org/CBM79.html

Ligand specificities

CBM79 is a family identified in the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome, an anaerobic, cellulolytic bacterium that plays an important role in the ruminal digestion of plant cell walls [1]. Two CBM79s (CBM79-1RfGH9 and CBM79-2RfGH9) were identified in an enzyme that contains a catalytic module derived from GH9 with endo-β1,4-glucanases activity. Both CBM79s bind to a range of β-1,4- and mixed linked β-1,3-1,4-glucans [2]. The ligand binding of CBM79-1RfGH9 was quantified by isothermal titration calorimetry and semi-quantitatively using microarrays [2]. CBM79-1RfGH9 binds barley β-glucan and hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) with similar affinities. The small increase in KA from cellotetraose to cellohexaose suggests that ligand recognition is dominated by four sugar binding sites. The binding to xyloglucan is weaker than the other β-glucans, indicating that the protein cannot recognize the xylose side chains. CBM79-1RfGH9 binds regenerated (noncrystalline) insoluble cellulose (RC) with a KA of 4.8 x 104 M-1 .


Structural Features

The structure of CBM79-1RfGH9 was solved using single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) methods and selenomethionyl protein to a resolution of 1.8 Å. CBM79-1RfGH9 has a β-sandwich fold and contains two β-sheets, 1 and 2, respectively (Figure 1) [2]. β-sheet 2 forms a cleft in which aromatic residues are a dominant feature. Tyr563, Trp564, Tyr597, Trp606 and Trp607 in CBM79-1RfGH9 form a twisted hydrophobic platform. In CBM79-1RfGH9, the concave surface forms an unusually solvent exposed cleft or planar surface, with loops connecting β-strands 1 and 2 and β-strands 4 and 5 strongly contributing to the curved topology of β-sheet 2. Two tryptophan residues (Trp564 and Trp606) play a key role in ligand recognition, adopting a planar orientation in CBM79-1RfGH9.


Functionalities

Content in this section should include, in paragraph form, a description of:

  • Functional role of CBM: Describe common functional roles such as targeting, disruptive, anchoring, proximity/position on substrate.
  • Most Common Associated Modules: 1. Glycoside Hydrolase Activity; 2. Additional Associated Modules (other CBM, FNIII, cohesin, dockerins, expansins, etc.)
  • Novel Applications: Include here if CBM has been used to modify another enzyme, or if a CBM was used to label plant/mammalian tissues? Etc.

Family Firsts

First Identified
Insert archetype here, possibly including very brief synopsis.
First Structural Characterization
Insert archetype here, possibly including very brief synopsis.

References

  1. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, and Henrissat B. (2009). The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D233-8. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkn663 | PubMed ID:18838391 [Cantarel2009]
  2. Davies, G.J. and Sinnott, M.L. (2008) Sorting the diverse: the sequence-based classifications of carbohydrate-active enzymes. The Biochemist, vol. 30, no. 4., pp. 26-32. Download PDF version.

    [DaviesSinnott2008]
  3. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, and Davies GJ. (2004). Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J. 2004;382(Pt 3):769-81. DOI:10.1042/BJ20040892 | PubMed ID:15214846 [Boraston2004]
  4. Hashimoto H (2006). Recent structural studies of carbohydrate-binding modules. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63(24):2954-67. DOI:10.1007/s00018-006-6195-3 | PubMed ID:17131061 [Hashimoto2006]
  5. Shoseyov O, Shani Z, and Levy I. (2006). Carbohydrate binding modules: biochemical properties and novel applications. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(2):283-95. DOI:10.1128/MMBR.00028-05 | PubMed ID:16760304 [Shoseyov2006]
  6. Guillén D, Sánchez S, and Rodríguez-Sanoja R. (2010). Carbohydrate-binding domains: multiplicity of biological roles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85(5):1241-9. DOI:10.1007/s00253-009-2331-y | PubMed ID:19908036 [Guillen2010]
  7. Armenta S, Moreno-Mendieta S, Sánchez-Cuapio Z, Sánchez S, and Rodríguez-Sanoja R. (2017). Advances in molecular engineering of carbohydrate-binding modules. Proteins. 2017;85(9):1602-1617. DOI:10.1002/prot.25327 | PubMed ID:28547780 [Armenta2017]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed